MailTags and openmeta tagging, redux

befuddled's Avatar

befuddled

10 Mar, 2010 03:23 PM via web

Just to follow up my now closed discussion, I did upgrade to MailTags 2.3.1 and I see the same behavior I observed previously; searching for "tag:xxxx" in the Finder only brings up files I have tagged with an openmeta application, like Leap, and a few emails which have the same keyword assigned in MailTags. None of the emails are recent and some of the emails that show up don't even have the relevant keyword applied according to the MailTags menu pane. However, searching for "keyword:xxxx" does bring up all emails that have had the relevant keyword added plus the same emails that apparently don't have the keyword assigned (as far as I can tell). In short,
i) MailTags keywords are still not openmeta compatible
ii) For some reason, keywords are being associated with emails but are not shown in the MailTags menu.
I still use MailTags (a lot) but as of now I have to do two searches for any given tag/keyword.

  1. Support Staff 2 Posted by Scott on 10 Mar, 2010 05:35 PM

    Scott's Avatar

    MailTags 2.3.1 doesn't have the latest changes I have incorporated into the snow Leopard version.
    Can you try the following build
    http://www.indev.ca/Downloads/PreRelease/MailTagsSLCR7b1.dmg

    While it does state Snow Leopard compatibility release, it is indeed compatible with 10.5 -- I just haven't announced it yet.

  2. 3 Posted by befuddled on 10 Mar, 2010 06:19 PM

    befuddled's Avatar

    Scott
    Thank you for the response.
    My workplace is not yet ready for SL. Is this build considered beta
    for Leopard? I am a little too busy to beta test at the moment.
    Thanks again.

    ___________________________
    befuddled
    on the road
    sent from iPhone

  3. Support Staff 4 Posted by petra on 10 Mar, 2010 06:24 PM

    petra's Avatar

    It's working for us but hasn't been tested yet by our beta testers.

  4. Support Staff 5 Posted by petra on 26 May, 2010 08:27 PM

    petra's Avatar

    Hi

    This is a old issue and several updates have come out since its initial report but I see the issue is still open.

    Are you still experiencing this issue with the latest release of MailTags or can I close it?

  5. 6 Posted by befuddled on 27 May, 2010 09:12 PM

    befuddled's Avatar

    Well, I am not sure if it is working. For example, I searched in Mail
    for "xxxx" in "keywords" and pulled up 585 messages. All of these
    appeared to have keywords assigned (previously I had messages that
    would appear in a search but there were no keywords indicated). I
    searched in Spotlight for "keyword:xxxx" (and in the Finder using
    "Keyword contains xxxx") and got 625 messages. If I do the same thing
    for "tags" I got 107 messages. I also searched in Leap and the results
    agreed with Spotlight/Finder. So I don't understand the discrepancy.
    It does appear that messages to which I have assigned keywords
    recently with Mailtags are appearing in the "keywords" searches in
    Spotlight/Finder and in Leap. My understanding, from the Leap
    documentation, is that open meta tags are "tags" and that "read-only
    tags set by other applications (like Mailtags) are referred to as
    keywords" (I am paraphrasing). Leap, for instance, doesn't show any
    editable tags when I select a message that has the "xxxx" keyword
    assigned.
    Maybe this is a difference in how keywords/tags get assigned and where
    they are stored. My conclusion is that if I am looking for a message
    in Mail, searching for a Mailtags keyword seems reliable. But if I am
    looking in the Finder or in Leap, I have to search for both "keywords"
    and "tags" to find everything (and I still don't understand the file
    number differences). In short, while I like the idea, I think these
    tagging/keyword schemes are of limited use.
    Thanks for asking.

  6. Support Staff 7 Posted by Scott on 28 May, 2010 05:46 PM

    Scott's Avatar

    Hello

    because of changes to the open meta framework that many pieces of software use, versions installed is somewhat important. As a rule OM should update existing data as it needs to to conform to the changes but something it doesn't alway happen.

    One thing that may help is to rebuild your spotlight database.

    in the terminal the following command will do this

    mdutil -E /
    
  7. 8 Posted by befuddled on 02 Jun, 2010 03:52 PM

    befuddled's Avatar

    Hi
    I had previously rebuilt the spotlight database (and reindexed the tags) and there are still differences in the search results. For some reason, there were many messages (so not just due to random error) with misassigned tags (visible in Leap/Finder but not in MailTags). I fixed those but the search results still don't coincide. I did notice there was about a seven month period (around 1/09 to 8/09) where NO messages were showing in the MailTags keyword search. I checked (these were archived messages) and there were messages with the appropriate tag in this time period. Just scrolling through the list caused the Leap search to update and now MailTags is finding many more messages with the search keyword. However, the keywords in this time period are very much messed up (misassigned keywords) and the search results are still not the same. Maybe there was a "bad" version of MailTags in that time period or something got corrupted.
    I will try another spotlight update tonight.
    Thanks.

  8. Support Staff 9 Posted by petra on 01 Sep, 2010 07:05 PM

    petra's Avatar

    Hi

    This is an old issue and several updates have come out since its initial report but I see the issue is still open.

    Are you still experiencing this issue with the latest release of MailTags or can I close it?

  9. 10 Posted by befuddled on 09 Sep, 2010 09:15 PM

    befuddled's Avatar

    Things seem to be behaving better now for me now, with the later versions.
    Close 'er up.
    Thanks.

  10. Scott closed this discussion on 10 Sep, 2010 12:12 AM.

Comments are currently closed for this discussion. You can start a new one.